|
|
Post by Anaheim GM on Mar 15, 2006 16:23:01 GMT -5
Scoring Summary
Period 1
1. ANAHEIM, RUCCHIN 23 (LILJA, ALFREDSSON), 05:00
PENALTIES: S. RUCCHIN ANH (BOARDING, Minor) 05:00
In the first period of the Washington game Steve Rucchin scored a goal while simultaneously being called for a boarding penalty. The best explanation of this miracle on ice wins $50,000 in cold, hard cash.
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM on Mar 15, 2006 16:26:42 GMT -5
After scoring the goal he nailed someone into the boards and therefore got a goal and a penalty at the same time as the time stops after a goalie.
$50,000 PLEASE? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by torontogm on Mar 15, 2006 21:01:21 GMT -5
After scoring the goal he nailed someone into the boards and therefore got a goal and a penalty at the same time as the time stops after a goalie. $50,000 PLEASE? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I thought the time stopped after a goal, not a goalie. Since I corrected this mistake, I think the 50K is mine. |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Cherni on Mar 15, 2006 21:11:19 GMT -5
What about this scenario? Washington had the puck on a delayed penalty for Rucchin's boarding penalty, and scored on their own net, on say an errant pass up the middle from nearly behind the net, deflecting off of Washington's goalie and bulging the twine. A la the NHL's Steve Smith in the 1986 playoffs, when the then Oilers defenseman scored the eventual game winning goal on Grant Fuhr, against Calgary, eliminating the Oilers from the playoffs and their third straight Stanley Cup.
So since Rucchin was the last Duck to touch the puck, the goal would be credited to him, even though the referee had his arm up on a delayed penalty, and waiting to assess a penalty to Rucchin.
Ergo.......The $50K is MINE!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by torontogm on Mar 15, 2006 21:54:46 GMT -5
What about this scenario? Washington had the puck on a delayed penalty for Rucchin's boarding penalty, and scored on their own net, on say an errant pass up the middle from nearly behind the net, deflecting off of Washington's goalie and bulging the twine. A la the NHL's Steve Smith in the 1986 playoffs, when the then Oilers defenseman scored the eventual game winning goal on Grant Fuhr, against Calgary, eliminating the Oilers from the playoffs and their third straight Stanley Cup. So since Rucchin was the last Duck to touch the puck, the goal would be credited to him, even though the referee had his arm up on a delayed penalty, and waiting to assess a penalty to Rucchin. Ergo.......The $50K is MINE!!!!! What about the assits? |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Cherni on Mar 15, 2006 22:05:24 GMT -5
Considering every hockey league wants to promote scoring, the referee may have decided to assess the assists.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim GM on Mar 16, 2006 9:33:48 GMT -5
Wow, good stuff!. Dave...mega points for creativity and a realistic, but over-the-top scenario. Spencer, you get points for realism.
Dave's the big winner here.
Your cash pool will reflect the added $50,000. Good work and very entertaining!
|
|
|
|
Post by ex-BluesGM on Mar 16, 2006 10:34:46 GMT -5
These explanations are certainly entertaining but the real explanation is just that the sim is crazy.
a few weeks back (I don't remember which game) my goalie was given a Game Misconduct for Unsportsmanlike Conduct and then to top that...continued to play the rest of the game anyway.... go gif.
Any of you brainiacs have an explanation for this one?
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Cherni on Mar 16, 2006 16:34:13 GMT -5
Thanks Mark......Greatly appreciated, as that was definitely fun. Spencer had a good one too.
|
|
|
|
Post by CapitalsGM on Mar 16, 2006 16:40:04 GMT -5
Yes, thanks for the money.
" MONEY MONEY MONEY...MONEY MONEY" ;D ;D
|
|
