|
Post by coloradogm on Jan 23, 2006 6:34:46 GMT -5
Notice,
None of us real Pittsburgh guys are saying a word. (Pend GM Nate Erb does not count as a real Pittsburgh guy)
Thats b/c we all know what this Steeler team is al about, we got faith in the Black and Gold.
So talk all you want, our team is focused, driven and hungry.
We shall see who wins Super Bowl XL
I gotta feeling it's gonna be the Steelers!
|
|
|
Post by ColumbusGM on Jan 23, 2006 9:33:56 GMT -5
I'm hoping it is, I just love Big Ben, and the Bus.
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim GM on Jan 23, 2006 10:22:42 GMT -5
The Steelers didn't just win again. They dominated. Best of luck to the Seattle Seahawks. If the Steelers continue to play as they have played no team could beat them. They are simply playing the best football I have seen in decades.
We bitchslapped those Broncos. Sorry to all you Denver fans but you didn't put up much of a fight. Our team was just that much better.
Pittsburgh takes down Seattle by 14 points in the Superbowl. Jeff, we're coming to Detroit and partying like it is 1999...er....SuperBowl 40.
|
|
|
Post by formerDevilsGM on Jan 23, 2006 11:25:19 GMT -5
Ouch. Ouch...... Pitt handed it to us, they wanted it more. Palumalu is sick, the guy is on every freaken play..
I thought whoever who between broncos and Pitt would win the bowl but Seattle looked good in yesterday's game....
|
|
|
Post by LAKingsGM on Jan 23, 2006 11:30:25 GMT -5
TURNOVERS= LOSS in Championship games.
When Delhomme flops 3 to Seattle and Jake Plummer puts 2 on the carpet and throws two more INTs, you're going to lose ball games.
Pittsburgh scored 21 points off of turnovers in the game. That's the ballgame right there. Protect the football= Win Championships.
It's going to be a good Super Bowl. Better than some predict, IMO.
Seattle has good coaching and personnel. Pittsburgh is playing the best football I have ever seen.
Should be an extremely good Super Bowl.
Prediction:
Steelers 37 Seahawks 28
You heard it here first.
|
|
|
Post by ColumbusGM on Jan 23, 2006 12:57:02 GMT -5
TURNOVERS= LOSS in Championship games. When Delhomme flops 3 to Seattle and Jake Plummer puts 2 on the carpet and throws two more INTs, you're going to lose ball games. Pittsburgh scored 21 points off of turnovers in the game. That's the ballgame right there. Protect the football= Win Championships. It's going to be a good Super Bowl. Better than some predict, IMO. Seattle has good coaching and personnel. Pittsburgh is playing the best football I have ever seen. Should be an extremely good Super Bowl. Prediction: Steelers 37 Seahawks 28 You heard it here first. Like I said earlier about the Steelers vs Broncos game. It's tough for a Raiders fan to cheer for the Broncos. Well, that being said...it's nearly as tough for a Raiders fan to cheer for the Steelers. That being said, who can cheer against Jerome Bettis? For one game, I'll set aside my natural hatred for the Steelers, and cheer them on (I shouldn't say one game, because I did it against the Patriots, the Broncos, and many times in the regular season. I'm a huge Big Ben fan.). Go Steelers Go. You play the kind of football I wish the Raiders played.
|
|
|
Post by formerDevilsGM on Jan 23, 2006 14:20:40 GMT -5
Agree with you 100% about the turnovers Nate, the main reason the Broncos had such a good season was cause they took care of the ball and caused turnovers. They did the exact opposite yesterday, you add on top of that the great football the Pitt is playing the result is well an a$$ kicken.
Now that we lost I would have to say that it will be nice to see the bus win it, he is such a good guy and has had a great career and it would be a nice end to his Hall of fame career.
But most of all I want a good game, not like the games yesterday that were over pretty much at halftime.
I think Pitt will win (that does not mean I am cheering for them though).
The worst part of loosing yesterday is the hangover today from trying to drink the pain away.
|
|
|
Post by formerBostonGM on Jan 23, 2006 14:24:52 GMT -5
TURNOVERS= LOSS in Championship games. Protect the football= Win Championships. Somebody should have told that to Bettis before he almost "Ernest Bynered" the game against the Colts
|
|
|
Post by formerBostonGM on Jan 23, 2006 14:34:24 GMT -5
By the way, if anyone is brave enough to have any plans to come to Detroit to watch the Superbowl, a few of us are going dowtown to watch the game (Mark, Nate, myself, maybe Dave). So hit me up with an email if you want to meet up.
|
|
|
Post by ColumbusGM on Jan 23, 2006 15:17:37 GMT -5
By the way, if anyone is brave enough to have any plans to come to Detroit to watch the Superbowl, a few of us are going dowtown to watch the game (Mark, Nate, myself, maybe Dave). So hit me up with an email if you want to meet up. God I'd love to, but I'm holding a Super Bowl Party at the 11th Field Regiments Junior Ranks Mess. To add me into the equation at your get together though, just imagine a guy sitting at the table unable to speak due to the mass quantities of alcohol I've consumed.
|
|
|
Post by formerBostonGM on Jan 23, 2006 16:21:06 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that you won't be the only one with that problem
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Cherni on Jan 23, 2006 16:33:56 GMT -5
I will bet anyone a 5th round draft pick that Seattle mops the floor with the Steelers.
P.S. BOD don't take this too seriously! All in jest.....
|
|
|
Post by formerBostonGM on Jan 24, 2006 1:08:10 GMT -5
I'm thinking that the team name (minus the city) of the winner will begin in 'S' as well as end in 'S'. I'm also guessing that an African-American male will score a touchdown. I even go out on a limb and say that a white guy will throw a ball, and another white guy will kick it. The turf will be green, at least one guy will get drunk, and Dave B will be watching the game alone wearing women's underwear. Take that shiz to the bank.
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim GM on Jan 24, 2006 15:39:31 GMT -5
I will put my 5th up for that. It's a bet.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Cherni on Jan 24, 2006 16:44:42 GMT -5
Done deal.....A 5th for a 5th......
Duck soup! That's all I'll say!
|
|